AN HR adviser was SACKED for whingeing about only getting three chicken nuggets for lunch.
Dissatisfied Steven Smith “stormed off” after he was handed a £1.99 portion in the office canteen, an employment tribunal heard.
His claimed his colleagues were getting four or even five chicken nuggets[/caption]
The tribunal concluded he was unfairly dismissed by his employer Teleperformance Limited as the matter was not investigated properly by bosses and will now be awarded £5,181.60.
In September 2019, during a 12 hour shift Mr Smith had headed to the canteen and had asked for chicken nuggets, chips, beans and cheese.
As he saw only three pieces of meat put in a box for him, Mr Smith said “is that it?” and asked why his colleagues were given four or five, the canteen worker told the panel.
When he queried why others were getting four or five nuggets, he said he felt “antagonised” when he was told he could get three more for an extra 99p.
The dismayed 30-year-old “advised” the dinner lady he was not a “kid” before her she could keep it and saying “if I wanted a happy meal I would go to McDonalds”.
He then “forcefully pushed the box back” and “stormed off”, the tribunal heard.
The woman said the incident left her stomach “churning” and “almost afraid to come into work”.
She complained about his behaviour and Mr Smith was later sacked for gross misconduct after the company found he “acted violently”.
Most read in The Sun
Amanda Holden fans baffled by ‘her nan’ Myrtle as they think new show is REAL
Andrew bolts for Balmoral in bid to avoid being served sex assault papers
Pussycat Dolls in bitter legal war after Nicole Scherzinger demanded 75% of earnings
BOJO'S BIGGEST GAMBLE
What the PM's tax hikes mean for YOU after huge social care overhaul
Newlywed, 28, dies after doctors dismiss cancerous lumps on her leg as FAT
CARR'S A PA
Jimmy Carr, 48, reveals he's become a dad for the first time
But the judge decided that “the sarcastic remark about a happy meal is not by itself abusive nor rude.
“For some the comment may have been positive depending upon their food preferences. For others it may have been negative.”
After the incident Mr Smith was brought in for a disciplinary meeting to discuss the allegation that he had “assaulted” a canteen assistant.
In the meeting, Mr Smith said: “I just wanted to get food and get out to go back to my job.
“Due to the disillusion of what was presented before me in the white box at which the food was presented in and the sheer shock of what I was presented.
“It is not my fault that this canteen lady did [not] see or understand my dissatisfaction. She should have acknowledged my dissatisfaction and raised a complaint.
If I wanted a Happy Meal, I would go to McDonald’s
The canteen worker said: “I knew he was angry by his attitude and by his tone and language changed. He was not shouting but he was louder than he had previously been.
“I could tell by his face also. My stomach was churning at this.”
She then reported the incident as the kitchen staff found his behaviour “unreasonable”.
Mr Smith also explained he was on medication and had been working overtime for almost 12 hours.
The appeal hearing concluded that a”‘full and thorough” investigation had taken place and Mr Smith brought a claim for unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal/notice pay to an employment tribunal.
But the tribunal – held remotely – concluded the company’s investigation “fell out with the range of responses open to a reasonable employer”.
It noted he had a medical condition which causes his face to go red.